| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| * | Split nissy in other repos, see README.md | Sebastiano Tronto | 2023-05-01 | 1 | -244/+0 |
| | | |||||
| * | I made a mess, but it works. Still need to implement new optimal solver. | Sebastiano Tronto | 2023-03-05 | 1 | -2/+3 |
| | | | | | After that, a big redesign is due. | ||||
| * | Removed some code preparing for moving optimal solver away from general ↵ | Sebastiano Tronto | 2022-09-06 | 1 | -89/+55 |
| | | | | | | | coordinate solving. Kept symcoord for coordinate solving. | ||||
| * | Symcoord version of nissy. Interesting idea, but performance are | Sebastiano Tronto | 2022-09-06 | 1 | -8/+268 |
| | | | | | actually slower. AT THIS STAGE NISSY IS NOT USABLE. | ||||
| * | Removed array-size constants for certain objects (steps, commands...) | Sebastiano Tronto | 2022-02-27 | 1 | -46/+2 |
| | | |||||
| * | Added two-phase solver | Sebastiano Tronto | 2021-12-26 | 1 | -0/+46 |
| | | |||||
| * | some progress | Sebastiano Tronto | 2021-12-17 | 1 | -2/+1 |
| | | |||||
| * | Faster optimal solver. | Sebastiano Tronto | 2021-12-13 | 1 | -3/+5 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | This is a pretty big one, but unfortunately performance only improved by about 5%. I implemented one of the main ideas of nxopt, that is switching to the inverse scramble on the fly if it gives a lower branching factor. On the one hand it makes sense that it does not have such a huge impact, since it only rarely happens that we do have a lower branching factor on inverse, but on the other hand I am quite sad that the improvement is barely noticeable :-( Maybe the problem is that I have introduced a lot of new overhead and I can improve that in the future. Or maybe I am just overlooking something stupid. | ||||
| * | Multi-threaded pruning table generation - now it's actually fast :) | Sebastiano Tronto | 2021-12-09 | 1 | -1/+1 |
| | | |||||
| * | Little performance improvement in optimal solver - more to come! | Sebastiano Tronto | 2021-12-07 | 1 | -0/+2 |
| | | |||||
| * | Multithreading seems to be working now, it was easier than expected! | Sebastiano Tronto | 2021-11-20 | 1 | -1/+1 |
| | | |||||
| * | Load all necessary pruning tables for a step before the actual solving process | Sebastiano Tronto | 2021-11-15 | 1 | -0/+2 |
| | | | | | | starts. This is in preparation for multi-threaded solving (but don't get hyped, it will take time). | ||||
| * | Rewritten from scratch. Welocme nissy 2.0! | Sebastiano Tronto | 2021-11-11 | 1 | -0/+10 |
