<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>nissy/nissy-2.0beta7.tar.gz, branch master</title>
<subtitle>Where is nissy?</subtitle>
<id>https://git.tronto.net/nissy/atom?h=master</id>
<link rel='self' href='https://git.tronto.net/nissy/atom?h=master'/>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tronto.net/nissy/'/>
<updated>2021-12-17T21:14:54Z</updated>
<entry>
<title>bump version</title>
<updated>2021-12-17T21:14:54Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Sebastiano Tronto</name>
<email>sebastiano.tronto@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<published>2021-12-17T21:14:54Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tronto.net/nissy/commit/?id=6c562ab57b17259cb538f6295a123c02bcd7d082'/>
<id>urn:sha1:6c562ab57b17259cb538f6295a123c02bcd7d082</id>
<content type='text'>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>updated binary and src package</title>
<updated>2021-12-14T15:24:04Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Sebastiano Tronto</name>
<email>sebastiano.tronto@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<published>2021-12-14T15:24:04Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tronto.net/nissy/commit/?id=a9831ada32f9349b3d8973b07df3171455fbddcd'/>
<id>urn:sha1:a9831ada32f9349b3d8973b07df3171455fbddcd</id>
<content type='text'>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Faster optimal solver.</title>
<updated>2021-12-13T19:40:18Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Sebastiano Tronto</name>
<email>sebastiano.tronto@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<published>2021-12-13T19:40:18Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tronto.net/nissy/commit/?id=1215648b1ba3c592bd9d97b871349673d1702e44'/>
<id>urn:sha1:1215648b1ba3c592bd9d97b871349673d1702e44</id>
<content type='text'>
This is a pretty big one, but unfortunately performance only improved by about 5%.
I implemented one of the main ideas of nxopt, that is switching to the
inverse scramble on the fly if it gives a lower branching factor.
On the one hand it makes sense that it does not have such a huge impact, since
it only rarely happens that we do have a lower branching factor on inverse, but
on the other hand I am quite sad that the improvement is barely noticeable :-(
Maybe the problem is that I have introduced a lot of new overhead and I can improve
that in the future. Or maybe I am just overlooking something stupid.
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
