From e20e4f550ae373414d9bc106b1615a5c5896c9c4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sebastiano Tronto Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 19:39:44 +0200 Subject: Added pre-computation of short h48 positions --- TODO.txt | 13 +++++++------ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) (limited to 'TODO.txt') diff --git a/TODO.txt b/TODO.txt index 00b85c0..a52945f 100644 --- a/TODO.txt +++ b/TODO.txt @@ -1,18 +1,19 @@ Bug in esep table generation - - add pre-computation of h48 coordinates at distance <=7? - - unit tests (but how do I test? just leave it there to check regressions) - - Add long-running test for h0k4 (maybe as a tool?) - compute all tables for h<11 - - compute visited up to a fixed depth (7? 8?) + x compute visited up to a fixed depth 8 - compute additional step (if needed) to fill <=base - - brute-force the last 2 steps (only 18 moves + 18*15 move pairs) + - brute-force the last 2 steps (only 18 moves + 18*15 move pairs, + sim) - compare with known h0 results (from long-running test) - compute table for h=11 - - is is worth pre-computing stuff? - can it be unified to the other computation, or is it much better to do it ad hoc? + - Add long-running test for h0k4 (maybe as a tool?) + - tests for other sizes? - optimize - use cached values for invcoord_esep? check if it is faster + - Unify and improve performance of finding nasty sim + (right now we don't even use selfsim) + - parallelize with pthread (OLD: - Fails for UFRUFU, try command -- cgit v1.3