From 2048e5a99de981a53d5eeb8a66d98e281898c9f0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sebastiano Tronto Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 23:00:47 +0200 Subject: Add small comments on benchmark results --- benchmarks/benchmarks.md | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/benchmarks/benchmarks.md b/benchmarks/benchmarks.md index 9f4ec1a..805408d 100644 --- a/benchmarks/benchmarks.md +++ b/benchmarks/benchmarks.md @@ -216,6 +216,14 @@ Time per cube adjusted for tables size (in seconds \* GiB, lower is better). |H48 h7 k2 | 3.6GiB | 1.30 | 15.26 | | | |H48 h6 k2 | 1.8GiB | 1.24 | 14.76 | | | +## Comments on the results + +* Adjusting for table size, vcube generally is a bit faster than H48, + except for 20 moves scrambles where H48 is a clear winner. +* On sets of 25 scrambles, H48 performs better than vcube when using + multiple threads. However, this advantage will likely disappear (or + even invert) if we increase the size of the set. + ## Other notes * Missing values in the table mean that the test is very slow and I did -- cgit v1.3